Friday, January 17, 2014

Contract Law

Running Head : NameUniversityCourseTutorDate1 .In this illustration of Paul Stieger , He gave his assent card to Ms Garrets giving her authority to pr sufficeice session his reliance card to pay for her changes car rental and hotel consist . This agreement shows that Ms Garrett was an operator of Mr . Stieger . This is because Garret had been given certain(p) authority to process on behalf of Stieger . According to the law of representation we conclude that Garrett has actual authority to act as an component of Stieger still , Garrett acted beyond the Authority she had been given by using the credit card to pay for other changes apart from the car nephritic an hotel lodging she had been authorized . For 13 of the charges Garrett write Stieger name . This implied that she was performing as an agent on behalf of St ieger . In such a case the third party had no reason to interrogative the authority of Garrett . This means the third party is non nonresistant for the satisfy of GarrettFor the twain changes that Garrett signed her own name , she did not refer acting as an agent of any spark toss away . thence Garrett will be liable for her actions as she acted on her own behalfWe hence conclude that Stieger is liable for the 13 charges of which Garrett go out beyond her authority . This is because she was acting on his behalf . However , Stieger stand maintain reimbursement from Ms Garrett later for the charges that were beyond her authorityFor the 2 changes that Garrett signed her name , she will be fully liableIn the case of Brenda smith , she was injured by a falling hood and was to be compensated by the insurer of the building . She had undertake Floyd Goldsman as her attorney meaning they had entered into an agency descent . Goldsman acted as Brenda metalworker s agent in suing Cynfax Goldsman had express authori! ty to act as an agent of smith .
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The insurers of Cynfax agree to narrow the claim on February 4th . Unknown to them and to Goldsman , the agent , smith had died two eld beforeAccording to the law of agency , agency relationship is concluded in case of dying , insanity or unsuccessful person of every the principal or the agent (American Samoa Bar railroad tie 2007 . Brenda metalworker died on 2nd February , meaning her agency relationship with Goldsman stop that day However , neither Goldsman nor Cynfax knew of her death and so Goldsman acted as an agent of Smith on February 4th when Cynfax insurers agreed to settle the claims . The law requires that upon effect the agent to be notified of the termination , otherwise the termination does not take effect . Thus as Goldman did not know that Smith had died it was right for her to act as agent on February 4thHowever , after learning of Smith s death Goldsman went ahead and accepted the offer from the insurers . In this , he was not supposed to act as an agent . terminal of the...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.